Tuesday, 31 January 2017

Dimetrodon Broods

Ebu Gogo has had many broods sired by dimetrodons. These hybrid offspring are a combination of hominid and synapsid features mixed together in manners unusual, unfortunate, unique. Like all their mother's offspring they have inherited something of her forest magicks. 

Groups of half-dimetrodons or specific individuals should be generated through the following stages.

Basic Body Type
1 - Hominid (walks on two legs at a rate of 120, 2 HD)
2 - Dimetrodon (walks on all fours at a rate of 180, 4 HD)
3 - Amalgam (walks awkwardly after extended periods either way, so switches; moves at 90, 3 HD)

1 - Hominid (no advantages)
2 - Dimetrodon (poor eyesight means they are surprised on a 1-4; can bite for 1d6 damage)
3 - Amalgam (can bite for 1d3 danage)

1 - Hominid (can wield weapons and manipulate objects; if the basic body type is dimetrodon only one-handed melee weapons can be used, at -2 to hit)
2 - Dimetrodon (can scratch for 1d4 damage; if the basic body type is dimetrodon the creature can rear up to scratch)

1 - Balancing only
2 - Whip tail (can attack for 1d4 damage)

Spine Sail
1 - Small sail (no benefit)
2 - Medium sail (1 in 3 chance that melee or missile attacks hit the sail for only 1 hp damage)
3 - Large sail (1 in 2 chance that melee or missile attacks hit the sail for only 1 hp damage)

Skin Colour
1 - Green (can pass without trace 1/day)
2 - Yellow (can cast confusion 1/day)
3 - Brown (can summon insects 1/day)
4 - Orange (can cast slow 1/day)
5 - Red (can produce fire 1/day)
6 - Unusual (purple, blue, black, white - randomly select or choose a 4th-level druid or magic-user spell)

Sail Colour
The pattern is solid, spotted, swirls, or stripes (roll a d4); this decoration is a paler or darker iteration of the skin colour. 

Dimetrodon hybrids have AC 14. They can use their sail movements to communicate simple concepts at a distance. They resist all heat attacks. 

Thursday, 26 January 2017

The Convex Game Designer

Nassim Taleb somewhere in his writings (I forget where exactly) discusses a concept he called "convexity". Convexity is a situation in which there is an inconsequential downside but a potentially huge upside. A situation in which bad luck will have very little effect but good luck will play huge dividends.

Once you grasp the concept, you can apply it quite easily in your daily life. Going to parties and any kind of social event gives you convexity - nothing really bad is going to happen to you, but you might end up meeting the love of your life or meet a potential business associate who transforms your career, etc. You don't really lose anything except an evening's time, but there are all kinds of potential lucky benefits. 

He also uses the concept, naturally enough, to discuss financial investments - if you keep 90% of your portfolio in cash or gilts and then put the remaining 10% on hugely risky investments the worst thing that will happen to you is you'll lose 10%, but there is no upper limit to your potential gains. 

What interests me most are his ideas about convexity and creativity. He cites the example of Einstein as somebody who had a convex career. He was a patent clerk - the most boring, dependable, steady job you could imagine. It gave him sufficient financial security with very little risk. But then in his spare time he wrote insanely ambitious academic physics papers and sent them to leading journals. He was very secure against bad luck (steady job with very little chance of losing it) but had the potential to benefit massively from good luck (if his papers got published). 

This may be the ideal: no real exposure to bad luck; huge exposure to good luck. 

A lot of successful writers are like that. Stephen King had a safe and steady job as a teacher but in his spare time wrote stories; one day Carrie got bought for $200,000. Tolkien was a jobbing academic (as much as that can be true of an Oxford don) while he wrote what at the time were pretty unusual fantasy stories which suddenly one day became very successful. It's certainly not a pattern that the Truly Great Creatives follow (e.g. Van Gogh) but it's interesting how many creative people entirely unconsciously have a "convex" way of doing things.

Is there a lesson in that for people who write gaming materials? It's not as though you're going to ever be Stephen King. I think the way to be convex is basically to be as ambitious as you can possibly be - no half measures. If you are going to spend time writing something you ought to go hugely risky with it. Think of yourself like Nassim Taleb's investment portfolio. 90% of your time is more likely than not an ordinary job. That's safe. So in the 10% of your time you have for creative pursuits, don't play it safe. You want huge exposure to good luck - the potential that what you create will be absolutely bloody brilliant. If it's not you'll have lost almost nothing, and if it is you'll be much happier than if you just did something that was just goodish and solid. 

Tuesday, 24 January 2017

Books Will Outlive You

My friend Patrick is very much against PDFs. He is right to be. I think the PDF of a book is best thought of as being a bit like a "Greatest Hits" album or one of those awful "Chilled Classics" compilations: a sort of thin, scraped-off surface film from the top of a stew that has none of the nutritious content of the meat and veg underneath. The content of a PDF may be the same as a book, but people only interact with it by skimming off that top layer. Scroll up, scroll down. Look at the pretty pictures. Read a paragraph here or there. Press Alt+Tab. Check what's going on on Facebook. Alt+Tab back to the PDF. Scroll up, scroll down. Look at the pretty pictures. Read a paragraph here or there. Press Alt+Tab. Check you email. Etc. This is not people's fault. It's the technology. The PDF is useful for easy distribution. It is bad, very bad, for actual sustained reading.

(At this point somebody will chime in in the comments about how they prefer to read books on their PDF and have no problem focusing while reading a book on screen. Good for you - really, I don't mean that at all facetiously. But you are unusual.)

There is another reason to be against PDFs. Imagine you had to predict whether it is more likely that books or PDFs will be defunct technologies in 100 years' time.

The answer is PDFs. Books have been around for an exceedingly long time. They've proved that they are robust to technological development and social change of great magnitude. PDFs have not. I make no predictions, but given that nobody has any idea what will happen over the course of the next 100 years, you have to back the humble book to last the course. And if you want to create or even merely possess things that will last, go paper.

The final reason to be against PDFs: things made from trees are beautiful. I sit here on a wooden floor with my laptop resting on an opium table made from mango wood. Next to me is a book made from paper that feels and smells gorgeous. Don't buy into the anti "dead tree" hype. Beauty matters.

Monday, 23 January 2017

Cheap Truth and Networking for Introverts/Misanthropes

In the early 80s Bruce Sterling edited a fanzine he called Cheap Truth. It was distributed on single sheets of paper you were supposed to photocopy and pass around yourself (Sterling was an early pioneer of the Creative Commons, essentially). You can read all of the issues of it online. Even were it not for the fact that the writing is great (read the obituary for Theodore Sturgeon by Brian Aldiss if you don't believe me), it's also worth it for the reviews. My "to read" shelf has expanded considerably since I discovered it.

What a strange world 1980 was when viewed backwards through the wrong end of binoculars. A lot's happened in 37 years. It's trite to point to the existence of the internet but it's worth considering that it really wasn't that long ago that somebody like me would not have had a creative outlet anything like this blog. I could have written for magazines and whatnot, of course, but if I had wanted creative control over what I was writing my only option would have been the Sterling route. Printing out fanzines (probably typewritten) and, I dunno, leaving them at the local bookshop, gaming shop and library?

But Cheap Truth probably succeeded because, let's face it, Bruce Sterling wasn't just printing it out and leaving it at his local bookshop. He was in "the scene", at conventions, hanging out with famous or soon-to-be-famous writers. I'm not sure, but I have always had the impression that the 'zine was a kind of in-joke; although Sterling edited it pseudonymously everybody who was anybody in SF and fantasy at the time knew it was him. They read it and distributed (plenty of them also probably also wrote for it) and gradually "real" magazines got to know about it too (it's said that Sterling stopped producing it once it got a mention in Rolling Stone, back when Rolling Stone was actually important).

At the same time, while Bruce Sterling isn't exactly Errol Flynn, he's clearly got the necessary charisma and get-up-and-go you need to be the locus of a "movement" of some kind. A mixture of ideologue, tub-thumper, leader and persuader. The kind of person who has the force of personality to bring others together and get them working.

In other words, it's worth pausing to consider what a boon the internet has been for people who don't live in New York or London and don't move in certain circles and/or who are introverted or for other reasons are terrible at face-to-face networking. For what it's worth I don't really classify myself as an introvert or an extrovert, but probably lean somewhat towards the extrovert side of the scale; it's something that depends a lot on my mood. I'm not sure what my internet persona is like but in real life I'm confident with other people and get energized by their company, but I am also perfectly happy when by myself. I'm not terrible at networking. At the same time, though, nor am I Bruce Sterling. I don't have either the time or the inclination or the opportunity to go to SF conventions and become known. If it wasn't for the internet nobody except my gaming group would know or give a fuck about Yoon-Suin.

What you lose on the swings you gain on the roundabouts. As time goes on I increasingly wonder whether the internet is really a Good Thing for all sorts of reasons, but it's worth being thankful that people who aren't like Bruce Sterling get the chance to actually do things too now.

Friday, 20 January 2017

The Mythago Problem

I am a big fan of dream-worlds, faerie-lands, parallel universes, and so forth. The great struggle with all of that, though, is that - almost by necessity - it can feel as though events in the "non-real" otherworld can feel precisely that: non-real. They can lack weight and substance. It can feel as though nothing there has meaning, or can change, or can really be interacted with. On the other hand, if you start to introduce petty real-world concerns like money, land, and so forth into a faerie otherworld, you deprive it of its difference and make it seem like simply another part of the "normal" world.

I know of no better illustration of this than Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. In those stories the otherworld doesn't play by our rules of economics, politics, geography and so on. It operates on a different logic and has different considerations. It doesn't even abide by our understanding of time or space. As a consequence it has a strangely permanent sort of a feel - there is always the sense that Alice is an alien in it and her presence there doesn't particularly affect anything. That is part of those stories' charm, of course, but it would be hard to make an actual game purely about the Alice books. (Though A Red and Pleasant Land did a great job of pastiching it while mixing it in with other influences.) What does Alice do except wander around as a stranger in a strange land and encounter weird things? Put in more prosaic D&D terms - what would a party of PCs do in Wonderland except wander around as strangers in a strange land and encounter weird things? Searching for treasure or conquering new realms or doing missions for the Queen of Hearts seems in a sense like a category error. Wonderland isn't about that.

This is why the Tim Burton film of Alice in Wonderland was so dreadful. Not satisfied with simply re-telling Alice in Wonderland, Burton felt compelled to make it an actual story about power, rulership, and so on. This made Wonderland into just another fantasy setting, full of political struggle, which is just diametrically opposite to what Lewis Carroll was driving at in every single sense I can think of. Burton made all of it - the Queen of Hearts, the Mad Hatter, the March Hare, the Cheshire Cat - just a vaguely charming version of any given fantasy setting, with a by-the-numbers high fantasy plot.

I call this the Mythago problem, after Holdstock's Mythago Wood books. The Mythago Wood books are great, but they aren't gameable. That's because the eponymous wood - a faerie otherworld if ever there was one - isn't a world in which typical D&D concerns (wealth, war, politics, quests, etc.) matter. It's a world where emotional concerns like father-son relationships and the growth from adolescence to adulthood matter. It's about expressionism. It's not about gathering XP. Play a game of D&D in Mythago Wood and it's not Mythago Wood anymore. It's just a wood full of stuff to kill, rob, play politics with, etc.

I have been wrestling with this problem a lot writing Behind Gently Smiling Jaws. I think I've got there - though the proof will have to be in the pudding - but its viciousness shouldn't be underestimated. The moment you introduce human concerns into a dream-world, you can quite simply end its independent existence as a dream-world and render it mundane. Kadath isn't Kadath if all you're doing there is the normal D&D things...but if you're not doing the normal D&D things, what do you actually do there?

Thursday, 19 January 2017

Thoughts on New Frontiers

Without wanting to sound too appallingly self-congratulatory or sweeping, we, "the OSR" (a term I hate but to which I have no alternative) have I think come up with a good number of innovations - the practice of D&D and RPGs in general has been advanced in quite a few directions in the last 10 years, and some considerable distance too. We have new and better ways of doing certain things, more efficient and well-thought out tools, and clever novel systems and rules. We have city kits (Vornheim), pointcrawls (Misty Isles of the Eld), novel and intuitive skill and language systems (Lamentations of the Flame Princess), cool new ways of doing magic (Wonder & Wickedness) and so forth.

What else needs to be done, though? What areas are left unexplored? Where are the new frontiers for this corner of the hobby? Well, in my view they are:

  • Innovations in overland travel. I think Veins of the Earth, when it eventually comes out, will do this for the underworld. And a lot has been written about dungeons. But it seems to me that "the PCs travel across the Dragon Mountains from point A to point B" is the kind of episode whose surface has barely been scratched. Making overland travel interesting is an area I want to see start to be really properly mined for ideas.
  • Underwater adventures. The first person to make a really good underwater module, campaign setting, etc., wins a coconut.
  • Exploration generally. There's a region of a campaign setting's map which is unexplored. The PCs set out to find out what's there. Currently what are the options apart from making it a hexcrawl with some random encounters and monster lairs thrown in?
  • Usable systematic ways to make dungeons (or hexmaps or anything else) evolve over time with or without the influence of the PCs. I want to see ways to make a dungeon in particular change dynamically over time, so that the DM can roll a few dice in between visits by the PCs and find out what the inhabitants get up to in the interrim.
  • Alchemy. Not just blowing stuff up. 
  • New real-world cultural inspiration from untapped mythologies and regions. Where's the Aztec-inspired campaign setting? The Maori-inspired one? The Ethiopian-inspired one? Etc.
That'll do for now. Get cracking. 

Tuesday, 17 January 2017

Ebu Gogo in the Primodial Swamp

She came from one of the Spice Islands. A diminutive, naked female from an obscure remnant of a dying hominid line. She is the last of her people: the rest were killed by disease and slaughter in an invasion by Portingale privateers. She fled to Paradijs on a raft and came to the Guarded Lake seeking to enter the mind of the crocodile, where she might breed her tribe anew and find solace from the brute hostility of the outside world which had been thrust upon her.

She found her way to the dimmest, darkest, most distant of all of the crocodile's memories: the primordial swamp of its birth. Maybe it was some maternal connection she felt to the crocodile's opaque recollections of its own mother. Maybe it was simply her fear and sorrow compelling her ever deeper. In any case, she inhabits those memories now and dwells in that thick humid swamp, among the amphibian beasts whose descendants died so long ago not even the dinosaurs could remember them.

There, she broods, and breeds: from her womb she has sired generations of half-hominid, half-amphibian children who guard and serve her. A new tribe to replace the one that she lost. A new people building a new civilization in the crocodile's memories of the founding of the world.

Monday, 16 January 2017

The Fundamental Principles of RPG Style

In the early 20th Century the Swiss art historian Heinrich Wölfflin attempted in his Principles of Art History to come up with a method for describing works of art purely in terms of their form (rather than their quality). He eventually came up with five different "successions" which can be thought of almost as axes or spectra on which to locate a given work of art. Thus works of art can be compared on the basis of being linear vs painterly, planar vs recessional, tectonic vs a-tectonic, and so forth. You can then, according to Wölfflin, use this to understand and explain how representative forms change over historical periods.

Wölfflin's method is based on a cod-Hegelian historicist theory in which everything moves cyclically in a thesis-antithesis-synthesis sort of way, but his basic idea - coming up with a way to describe the differences between any given set of paintings - is interesting and sound. Let's try and do something similar with RPGs.

What I'm suggesting here is a normatively-neutral way of describing any game, campaign setting, adventure module, or even individual session, using these four handy Wölfflinian "successions":

Open v Closed. An open game system is one in which there are many (or infinite) possibilities - you could in theory do anything with it. Risus, GURPS, etc. A closed game system is one which is highly specific to a certain period or mood (Night Witches, Dogs in the Vineyard). An open campaign setting is one which leaves things, well, largely open (Isle of the Unknown, Planescape). A closed one is detailed and largely pre-determined (modern Forgotten Realms, the Known World). An open campaign is one which begins as open-ended. A closed one is one in which there is an expectation of a completed narrative arc. An open session is one in which the PCs begin without anything particular to do and set their own goals. A closed session is one in which what happens is largely dictated by circumstance.

Light-hearted v Serious. This is more self-explanatory. Light-hearted doesn't necessarily have to mean "humorous" - it could be, say, a non-combative animal fantasy game you run for your kids or something. Equally, it could be a game involving lots of death or torture if the players aren't taking things seriously or are playing Paranoia or something.

Easy v Hard. A hard game system would be Rolemaster. An easy one would be Ghost/Echo. An example of a hard campaign setting is Wraith: the Oblivion - you have to think about it a lot before you can really understand what's going on; an easy one is the Known World. An easy campaign is one which has simple goals or expectations (clear a dungeon); a hard one is complex and has many different strands. An easy session is one which places few demands on the players; a hard one requires lots of thought and effort.

Loose v Strict. A loose game system is forgiving and has rules which are readily broken or manipulated - like OD&D. A strict game system resists being fooled-around with, like D&D 4th edition. A loose campaign setting is one which does not hold fast to genre convention or to a specific canon, like Rifts. A strict campaign setting is one which does not mix well with others, like Middle Earth. A loose campaign is one in which the DM adopts a kitchen-sink approach; a strict one holds fast to expectations of genre, mood, or style. A loose session is one in which the players and DM frequently "break the fourth wall"; a strict session is one in which most things take place in-character.

Thus, you might describe D&D 5th edition as moderately open (you're generally going to use it for fantasy games, but other than that you're relatively free from constraint), moderately serious (there is a slight tongue-in-cheek element to it but it is essentially played straight), sitting between easy and hard, and relatively loose (you can fiddle with the rules quite easily).

Alternatively, you could compare D&D 5th edition with Pendragon and say it is more open, less serious, easier, and looser. Compared to Amber Diceless, Pendragon is more closed, about as serious, harder, and stricter.

Moving down to campaign settings, you could say Planescape is open, somewhat light-hearted, somewhat hard, and somewhat loose. It is more open than the World of Darkness, more light-hearted, harder, and looser. The World of Darkness is more open than the world of Cyberpunk 2020, more serious, harder, and stricter.

Yoon-Suin is somewhat open, somewhat serious, somewhat hard, and somewhat strict.

Maze of the Blue Medusa is somewhat closed, somewhat serious, quite hard, and quite loose.

Apocalypse World is somewhat closed, serious, somewhat easy, and somewhat strict.

In comparison to AD&D 2nd edition, BECMI is equally as open/closed, but a little bit more light-hearted, a little bit easier, and a little bit looser. On the other hand, 2nd edition is equally as open/closed as 3rd edition and probably equally as light-hearted/serious, but is a little bit easier and a little bit looser.

You can probably think of game sessions you've been involved in and how you might categorise them. I reckon the most recent one I played in was rather closed (it was a pre-published adventure), rather light-hearted (we approached it with a fair amount of levity), pretty easy (what we had to do was largely clear) and rather loose (we didn't hugely get into our characters and often commented on what was going on).

There may be other "successions" I've not thought of.

Saturday, 14 January 2017

In Praise of Maximalism

I expect if you're reading this you'll know about Melan's recent post, "Against Ultra-Minimalism". This post is an orthogonal response to that.

My basic idea of a good game book (whether a good rule book, good module, good bestiary, whatever) is that it should be well-designed - which typically means efficiently designed - and interesting to read. Those are the platonic ideals. While the design should therefore be "minimalist" in a functional sense - it should be minimally complex, i.e. only as complex as it needs to be - the approach to content is subject to a totally different set of considerations. Give me good, interesting, exciting, readable, imaginative, dare I say even poetic, prose. I don't want to read a rule book written like a car manual. I want to read a rule book written by Proust, Ellroy or Vance. I don't mind how different the style is, but give me style. Give me voice. Give me something good that I actually enjoy reading for its own sake.

By the same token, I don't want to read a book full of "This is a bronze-age village exporting pitch next to a bunch of Vikings and a colony of 15 ents." I want a rule book full of real ideas to inspire and entice - ideas that mean something - and which I wouldn't have thought of myself. I can't get enough of those.

So I don't actually mind how long a rule book is, if it's genuinely well-written and imaginative. I tend to prefer shorter books because most RPG writers are completely dreadful at writing and pretty unimaginative. But if you can write, and have good ideas, why go minimalist? Give me more of it. Be as maximalist as you like. Misty Isles of the Eld could have been twice as long and I'd have still loved it. Ditto Maze of the Blue Medusa. I want books, like those, that are brimming with invention, not limited by the false modesty of minimalism. "Less is more" as a principle is over-rated; you can over-egg these things, but nobody ever talks about the dangers of under-egging, which in my view are all the more pernicious because that sort of approach tends to take on the character of an orthodoxy which cannot be questioned.

Friday, 13 January 2017

Incomplete list of books which could form the basis for RPGs, but probably never will

The Dice Man, George Cockroft
The Game, Neil Strauss
Comical History of the States and Empires of the Moon, Cyrano de Bergerac
Blood Meridian, Cormac McCarthy
Snowblind, Robert Sabbag
The Nowhere Men, Michael Calvin
Undaunted Courage, Stephen Ambrose

Add your own.

Tuesday, 10 January 2017

Scenes of a Medieval Battlefield

Yesterday I headed up to North Northumberland, very close to the Scottish border, to the site of the Battle of Flodden. It is a very quiet and, in winter, desolate area, with beautiful but bleakish views of the Cheviot Hills and, really a stone's throw away, Scotland itself. Nearby is a small and exceedingly peaceful village, called Branxton. It is in all respects the middle of nowhere, but in 1513 somewhere in the region of 14,000 men were killed there in a matter of a few hours (a casualty rate apparently higher than on the first day of the Battle of the Somme). The retreating army of James IV, who had invaded England, were cut off in their path back North by an army led by the Earl of Surrey. James IV himself was among the dead.

The battlefield itself is very moving, because it is so well preserved. You can go on a relatively simple 1 hour hike around it, and information boards tell you what went on at various stages. It seems more-or-less unchanged since those days. The Scots primarily lost because of the weather and terrain - it had been raining in the area for weeks and on the day there was a rainstorm; the main body of Scottish pikemen got bogged down in knee-high mud in a marshy area which they hadn't realised was there. They lost their order and got pinned down by English longbowmen, and when they finally made their way clear in small exhausted groups they were killed easily by English men-at-arms with billhooks.

Even though that area has been drained now and it hasn't been a particularly wet winter, I had an inkling of what it must have been like - the mud was pretty thick underfoot, by turns slippery and thick. I certainly wouldn't have relished trying to navigate it dressed in armour and carrying a 14 foot pike.

I took some photos and thought I'd share them on the blog as a matter of interest for people interested in medieval conflicts.


A guide to the battle. 

The monument, to the dead of both nations. It's difficult to imagine Scotland and England at war with each other these days in some respects, and yet on the other hand I'm sure if Nicola Sturgeon could arm herself with a 14 foot pike in the name of Scottish independence she'd do it gleefully.

This is where the Scottish left flank stood, looking down the hill. The smaller slope in the middle distance is where the English were positioned. 

This is looking 45 degrees to the right from the same position, looking across to where the English centre and left flanks would have been positioned.

Looking parallel across the initial Scottish positions from roughly the position of the left flank.

The view the Scottish centre would have had, looking down at the English positions. If you'd had this view that day, the chances were pretty good that within a couple of hours you'd be dead or injured. From this point you can see Scotland in the distance (the Scottish town of Coldstream is about 4 miles away). An odd quirk to the battle is that the Scottish were positioned in the south and were attacking north. This is because they were heading back to Scotland and the Earl of Surrey had brought his army around to block off their path. 

This is where most of the fighting took place. The Scottish pikemen advanced down the slope (i.e. from the left of this picture towards the right) and then became bogged down here. So this is where the melee happened, and probably where James IV was killed as well. In those days political leaders who took their countries to war had real skin in the game. 

Monday, 9 January 2017

So Long Ago and Dream Dinosaurs on Venus

I found an old book while looking through boxes in my loft. It must have been bought for me as a kid at a car boot sale or something (it was published in 1944), but I can barely remember it. It is called So Long Ago, and it is beautiful and strange and brilliant.

The book is a kind of pictorial introduction to the prehistoric world, but it is what the prehistoric world looked like in 1944. The way people in the past thought about their own past is a source of endless fascination, just as much as the way they imagined the future. I think that somebody could probably write a Guided History of Past Imaginings of Dinosaurs if they wanted to: a chronicle of how dinosaurs have been conceptualised and re-conceptualised with each generation.

The art in the book is just completely delightful - and I don't use that word lightly. The illustrator and author, E. Boyd Smith, doesn't even appear to have a Wikipedia entry, but take a look at these pictures and tell me they don't delight you.

Just look at the face on that Tyrannosaur. He seems full of trepidation almost, as though compelled into violence which he does not really seek. The dinosaurs and other prehistoric beasts in the book are so anthropomorphized they are practically people. Everything about their eyes, faces and gestures is so incredibly expressive - even the dimetrodon in the first picture seems almost sad and desperate as he chases after his prey.

What kind of a world was the Boyd-Smithian prehistoric earth? A world thronging with sentient, thinking, feeling, creatures, almost more human than humans. A world of vivid colours and dream-like hallucinogenic vistas. A world that is almost friendly - yet one in which predation is everywhere and nobody can rest for a moment without having to find a way to defend themselves. It's like a world where everything is dialed to 11: everything in it lives with its heart on its sleeve, by turns euphoric, terrified, aggressive and playful.

This dream-dinosaur world is more fantasy than science, as we now know, but I love the idea of it and the vividness of its vision. I want to make a campaign setting there - or, more specifically, a campaign setting on an old pulp vision of a "wet Venus" covered in jungle and volcanoes and inhabited by these uber-emotional beasts. The fertile, fecund, feminine counterpoint to barren warlike authoritarian masculine Mars, as it was imagined, funnily enough, in the 1930s and 1940s - the era of E. Boyd Smith himself.

Thursday, 5 January 2017

We Were Never Being Boring, We Were Never Being Bored

Being bored is extremely important for the creative process. Sitting staring at a blank piece of paper, canvas or screen with nowhere to go, nothing to do, nothing to think, seems to be an essential part of what allows us to make things that are good and new. For long, long minutes you can sit there, putting every ounce of effort you can muster into trying to think up something, anything - trust me, this can be worse than an hour lifting weights or circuit training. Eventually, from the well of ideas that drills deep down into the middle of your soul, some wild and resistant gremlin of inspiration is dragged up, kicking and screaming, and then brutally pinned down onto the page, still breathing but broken. Then you make a cup of tea and wait for the next one.

The other reason why boredom is your friend and ally is that it forces you to sit down with that blank piece of paper in the first place. After you've cleaned the house and fed the cat and unblocked the plug hole and clipped your toe nails and picked out all your belly-button fluff and done every single little last thing that you can think of, boredom sets in, and that's when you can really get to work, because finally you have no excuse not to. 

TV, the internet, and social media are your sworn enemies, because they assuage boredom. You can sit down with a remote or mouse and flit from one little island of entertainment to another until it's time for bed, and never once feel as though you need to do anything creative at all. And if somehow you do get that feeling - which you will, as all human beings do - and do go and sit down with that blank piece of paper or screen or canvas, you can very quickly get sucked back down the rabbit hole of non-boredom the instant things get difficult. That remote control or mouse is still there. The siren song of cheap and unearned distraction. 

If you want to produce anything worthwhile, my son, embrace and even seek out boredom. 

Wednesday, 4 January 2017

A Taxonomy of RPG Fiction

The Tie-In Novel. Self-explanatory: a full novel based on the game or its setting. Examples: the Dragonlance series, the Blood Wars trilogy, the Shadowrun novels.

The Flavour Snippet. Small sections of text - usually just a sentence or paragraph - somewhere on the page to break up boring chunks of exposition and add to the "atmosphere". Generally purporting to be overheard from a conversation. Examples: perhaps most famously deployed in the Planescape books, but also prevalent in Cyberpunk 2020 ("Frack, she was good. She was the best...")

The In-World Expository Text. Part of what would otherwise be explanatory text or rules is introduced in the form of fiction or a fictional conceit. Has three sub-taxons:

(a) The Fictional Gazette. A fake magazine, newspaper, book, etc. in one volume. An item of realia which is dressed up as being an actual text from the setting. Examples: the Cyberpunk 2020 "Chromebooks" - essentially equipment lists but presented in the form of magazine adverts and articles. The recent Volo's Guide to Monsters for D&D 5th edition is another example of the Fictional Gazette. My journal of Laxmi Guptra Dahl from Yoon-Suin would probably fall under this taxon.

(b) The Fake Grimoire Extract. A segment of text, often used to introduce and describe a monster or certain key concept, that is supposedly taken as an extract from some non-existent longer work and inserted into the existing book. Example: any D&D Monstrous Compendium or Monstrous Manual where to break up the monotony one of the monster descriptions is done not by the author of the manual but by some supposed sage or adventurer.

(c) The Fictional Narrator Telling You About Things. A (typically annoying) fictional character appears in the book to explain certain things to you about the setting or give insights into aspects of it. Example: the description each type of fae gives of the other types of fae in the Changeling: The Dreaming Player's Guide ("Why bother? Those poor lost souls crouch so close to banality that they love machines more than people!").

The Literary Introduction. A paragraph or two of poetry, fictional prose, fake quotations and so on inserted between sections or chapters. Example: extracts from "The Book of Whispered Psalms" etc. in Houses of the Blooded.

The Fictional AP. A fourth-wall-breaking fictional account of an incident from a gaming session that didn't actually happen. Typically comes in the form of a script, with the GM and "Bill" and "Jane" as characters. Example: almost any page from Amber Diceless.

The Full-on Cringeworthy Rulebook Short Story. It would be cruel to list examples, but.... Unknown Armies. And The Blossoms Are Falling deserves a special mention for egregiously having two of them right in the middle of the book, one after the other.

The Good Rulebook Short Story. I'm not sure there actually is an example of anything within this taxon.

Tuesday, 3 January 2017

The Art of Reading RPG Books

When was the last time you actually read an RPG book cover-to-cover as though it was a novel? I have done so from time to time (most recently with Maze of the Blue Medusa), but much more often I approach them like a kind of literary flaneur. I dip in. I read a page here and a page there. Magpie-like, I gather bits and pieces of things that interest me. Sometimes this is just a flavour of inspiration that I take in a new direction. Sometimes it may just be a spark which sets my imagination off and running. When it comes to "crunch" I tend to scan through and identify the important bits and read them carefully. Sections of actual fiction never, ever get read. I probably read somewhere around 60-75% of the total content in the course of interacting with the book over time. 

This means that for me RPG books might as well be written in any order. In fact I wonder whether I wouldn't be better suited with an RPG book that would come in a folder and you could just pull out clearly defined sections to read - a completely modular setup. 

This also means that RPG books (in which the writing is complete shit as a general rule anyway) need to be really interesting at every turn if they're to be really successful. Each page has to have something good on it - preferably something which gives the reader ideas, in a presentable and quickly accessible way. The reader isn't engrossed in War and Peace. He's grabbing a book off the shelf and flicking through it, or sitting on the loo, or he's a player in a game idly perusing while his character is otherwise off-scene. The best book is one that works with that in mind. 

This is part of the reason why I quite like how Yoon-Suin turned out. I can't claim it being deliberate. But I think one of its successes is that when you open it up at a random page there is generally something on there that you can get interested in. It isn't just a page of blah, which is what you tend to get with most RPG books. 

Monday, 2 January 2017

5th Edition, Youthful Invulnerability and the Red Queen Syndrome

Shortly before Christmas I was one of two PCs playing through the introductory D&D 5th edition starter box adventure, The Lost Mine of Phandelver. It was a great evening, but I was struck by how this new edition lulls you into a false sense of security. You think that with so many hit points and abilities you are practically invincible and can take on all comers. In fact the opposite is the case because 5th edition monsters pack a heck of a punch; we effectively had two TPKs in the session because we kept stumbling into deadly scenarios thanks to our attitude of blithe self-confidence. Rookie players used to Basic D&D or OD&D, take note: you may have a lot of hit points and spells but that won't matter when bugbears do 2d8+2 damage per hit.

This is certainly a big improvement on 3rd and 4th edition, though you have to wonder if there isn't a bit of a red queen syndrome going on: 5th edition PCs, it seems to me after running and playing in about a dozen sessions, are about as fragile as Basic D&D ones. Everything has been amped up in turns of hit points and healing, but all the threats have been hugely boosted as well. The game works and is probably objectively the best version of D&D since the Rules Cyclopedia, but the feel is also quite similar to that iteration because the threat levels (and also the pure vanilla tonal palette) are effectively the same - it's as though we've gone through 20 years of change to end up in exactly the same position we were in back then. This is no bad thing, but perhaps a cautionary tale about the value of change in itself?

Sunday, 1 January 2017

The Names of Places

I take great pleasure in looking at maps - particularly low-level highly-detailed local maps like Ordinance Survey ones and road atlases. I can get lost in an AA road map for hours. One of the things that keeps me going is the richness of the names. Earlier, sitting around bored with nothing much to do on a family visit, I picked up a road map and flicked through. I was struck, like I often am, at how much more imaginative the real world can be in comparison to the supposedly highly creative fantasy author.

For instance, lying before me is the page covering the SW corner of Dumfries & Galloway. Just scanning the page I see the following utterly fantastic names:

Gatehouse of Fleet
St John's Town of Dairy
Townhead of Greenlaw

This is not to mention the odd habit of giving things two names, so you get stuff like "Kippford or Scaur" and "Rhonehouse or Kelton Hill", suggesting possibly that the locals call their village one thing and outsiders call it something else (or, better, that the village is divided like the Sharks and the Jets, fighting a constant bloody civil war over whether their home should be known as Crocketford or Ninemile Bar).

For some reason Southern Scotland has a particular genius for this sort of thing. I suspect it might be something to do with Anglo-Saxon speakers transliterating Gaelic or Cumbric phonetically, plus of course the influence of Norse. So you get names like:

Town Yetholm
Coaltown of Wemyss
Burntisland (actually pronounced like "Burnt Island")

You also get some great ones in Lincolnshire and the Fens, often featuring saints' names in a quite specific and peculiar style. Viz:

Wainfleet All Saints
Leake Common Side
Leake Hurn's End
Bennington Sea End
Little Sleeping
Old Bolingbroke
Scrane End
Terrington St Clement
Walpole St Andrew
Walpole St Peter
Castle Rising
Burton Pedwardine
Kirkby Underwood
Covenham St Bartholomew

I'm going to publish a module set in a village called Burton Pedwardine next to a megadungeon called Lilliesleaf.